PATT MORRISON SCHEDULE
Monday, January 31, 2011
CALL-IN @ 866-893-5722, 866-893-KPCC; OR JOIN THE CONVERSATION ONLINE ON THE PATT MORRISON BLOG AT KPCC-DOT-ORG
ALEX COHEN FILLS IN FOR PATT
1:06 – 1:30
1:30 - 1:58:30
Are community redevelopment agencies job-creating economic saviors or corrupting corporate welfare?
For decades they acted largely in the shadows of state politics, helping to fund some of the biggest development projects in some of the most neglected areas of
Chris McKenzie, executive director of the League of California Cities
Simone Wilson, staff reporter for the L.A. Weekly who has written extensively on CRA’s
Frank Stoltze, KPCC political & criminal justice reporter
2:06 – 2:30
“No Child Left Behind” Left Behind—for the more flexible “Every Child Counts”?
In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, President Obama said we need to replace No Child Left Behind with a law that’s “more flexible and focused on what’s best for our kids. “ Part of this call for flexibility is in response to the high number of schools who have received failing grades because of the law. Perhaps, then, Senator Tom Harkin’s suggested new name for the law, “Every Child Counts,” is more appropriate. The question of flexibility leads to the crux of the education debate in this country—how hands-on the federal government should be versus leaving it up to states and cities. Despite a five-year freeze on government spending, President Obama plans to rewrite No Child Left Behind, and members of Congress from both sides of the aisle are ready to join him in this reform. But there will surely be debate about what the details will look like, including national standards, Race to the Top and how states receive funding, standardized testing, emphasis on Math and English at the expense of other subjects, performance pay, and more. Did No Child Left Behind have standards that were too high or is its goal of having “no child left behind’ feasible by 2014?
Kim Anderson, Director of Government Relations, National Education Association
Michael Petrilli, (puh-TRILL-ee) vice president for national programs & policy at the Thomas Fordham Institute for Advance Educational Excellence; formerly served in the U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement.
2:30 – 2:39
2:41 – 2:58:30
Is Facebook making us unhappy?
In a virtual world where you can filter and sculpt your public persona, sociologists are increasingly finding that hours spent viewing our peers’ polished lives—their awesome vacations; their nights out partying; their above-average-children—is making us unhappy. Are they Just Like Us? Or are they happier and framed in better lighting? Recent studies say Facebook makes us underestimate how unhappy and lonely others are; it leads us to believe that our friends and family are all happier than us. Does Facebook make us less happy? Or at least force us to project a happy image with all those “Like” and no “Hate” buttons?
Karen Sternheimer, sociology professor at the
CALL HER @
Libby Copeland, contributing writer for Slate XX
Senior Producer, Patt Morrison
NPR Affiliate for
email@example.com / firstname.lastname@example.org